In more than 70 countries, Médecins Sans Frontières provides medical humanitarian assistance to save lives and ease the suffering of people in crisis situations.
We set up the MSF Access Campaign in 1999 to push for access to, and the development of, life-saving and life-prolonging medicines, diagnostic tests and vaccines for people in our programmes and beyond.
Based in Paris, CRASH conducts and directs studies and analysis of MSF actions. They participate in internal training sessions and assessment missions in the field.
Based in Geneva, UREPH (or Research Unit) aims to improve the way MSF projects are implemented in the field and to participate in critical thinking on humanitarian and medical action.
Based in Brussels, MSF Analysis intends to stimulate reflection and debate on humanitarian topics organised around the themes of migration, refugees, aid access, health policy and the environment in which aid operates.
This logistical and supply centre in Brussels provides storage of and delivers medical equipment, logistics and drugs for international purchases for MSF missions.
This supply and logistics centre in Bordeaux, France, provides warehousing and delivery of medical equipment, logistics and drugs for international purchases for MSF missions.
This logistical centre in Amsterdam purchases, tests, and stores equipment including vehicles, communications material, power supplies, water-processing facilities and nutritional supplements.
BRAMU specialises in neglected tropical diseases, such as dengue and Chagas, and other infectious diseases. This medical unit is based in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Our medical guidelines are based on scientific data collected from MSF’s experiences, the World Health Organization (WHO), other renowned international medical institutions, and medical and scientific journals.
Providing epidemiological expertise to underpin our operations, conducting research and training to support our goal of providing medical aid in areas where people are affected by conflict, epidemics, disasters, or excluded from health care.
Evaluation Units have been established in Vienna, Stockholm, and Paris, assessing the potential and limitations of medical humanitarian action, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of our medical humanitarian work.
MSF works with LGBTQI+ populations in many settings over the last 25-30 years. LGBTQI+ people face healthcare disparities with limited access to care and higher disease rates than the general population.
The Luxembourg Operational Research (LuxOR) unit coordinates field research projects and operational research training, and provides support for documentation activities and routine data collection.
The MSF Paediatric Days is an event for paediatric field staff, policy makers and academia to exchange ideas, align efforts, inspire and share frontline research to advance urgent paediatric issues of direct concern for the humanitarian field.
The MSF Foundation aims to create a fertile arena for logistics and medical knowledge-sharing to meet the needs of MSF and the humanitarian sector as a whole.
A collaborative, patients’ needs-driven, non-profit drug research and development organisation that is developing new treatments for neglected diseases, founded in 2003 by seven organisations from around the world.
Noma is a preventable and treatable neglected disease, but 90 per cent of people will die within the first two weeks of infection if they do not receive treatment.
Warning: Undefined variable $active_link in Drupal\msf_navigation\Plugin\Block\SOCSSectionNavBlock->build() (line 52 of modules/custom/msf_navigation/src/Plugin/Block/SOCSSectionNavBlock.php).
L’étude de cas ‘ Traque et massacres des réfugiés rwandais au Zaire-Congo 1996-1997’ examine les contraintes, les questionnements et les dilemmes posés aux équipes de Médecins Sans Frontières en 1996 et 1997, alors qu’elles s’efforçaient de porter secours aux réfugiés rwandais dans l’Est du Zaire, dont les camps avaient été attaqués par les rebelles soutenus par l’armée rwandaise.
Dilemmes et questionnements:
Est-il possible pour MSF d'extrapoler publiquement sur les conditions sanitaires des réfugiés alors que l’accès à ces derniers lui était interdit ?
A l’inverse, faute d’accès, est-ce que MSF doit s’interdire de faire part de ses prévisions catastrophiques ?
Prévoir le pire est-il ou non judicieux pour une organisation humanitaire ?
Ses équipes étant utilisées comme appât pour attirer puis massacrer les réfugiés, est-ce que MSF devait mettre fin à ses opérations dans la zone concernée ou bien les poursuivre en dénonçant cette manipulation dans l’espoir d’empêcher les massacres, mais au risque de mettre en danger ses équipes et ses autres opérations dans la région ?
Est-ce que MSF devait plaider le maintien des réfugiés dans l’Est du Zaïre sachant qu'ils affronteraient des dangers mortels, ou bien participer à leur rapatriement autoritaire au Rwanda où leur sécurité n’était pas plus garantie ?
